<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lib Dems &#8211; go back to your constituencies and prepare to complain&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberal-vision.org/2010/02/08/lib-dems-go-back-to-your-constituencies-and-prepare-to-complain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2010/02/08/lib-dems-go-back-to-your-constituencies-and-prepare-to-complain/</link>
	<description>Looking Forward to Freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Harbutt</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2010/02/08/lib-dems-go-back-to-your-constituencies-and-prepare-to-complain/comment-page-1/#comment-4146</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Harbutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=4936#comment-4146</guid>
		<description>Gosh Richard that was somewhat full on. I dont believe that anything I said in that piece was &quot;nasty&quot; - I simply do not believe it is appropriate, this close to an election, that a broadcaster should be handing over substantial amounts of air time to what amounted to an extended PPB. This counts as undue prominence as there are no plans to afford equally sympathic personal interviews of the leaders of the other main parties. ITV has broken its own rules on balance and I believe, section 5 of OFCOMs broadcasting code (Due impartiality...undue prominence etc). 

My criticism was unequivocally of the broadcaster not the man. 

As for complaining about David Cameron talking about the NHS - well you can complain to OFCOM if you feel that the Tory leader received -in any one period- undue prominence. Or you could complain to the broadcaster concerned. Generally broadcasters meticulously monitor their own output to ensure there is a reasonable balance (and to answer complaints from political parties - which are many). But if you think they got it wrong, then tell them. 

I think ITV have got it very wrong on this occassion, with this particular &quot;interview&quot;, hence my complaint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh Richard that was somewhat full on. I dont believe that anything I said in that piece was &#8220;nasty&#8221; &#8211; I simply do not believe it is appropriate, this close to an election, that a broadcaster should be handing over substantial amounts of air time to what amounted to an extended PPB. This counts as undue prominence as there are no plans to afford equally sympathic personal interviews of the leaders of the other main parties. ITV has broken its own rules on balance and I believe, section 5 of OFCOMs broadcasting code (Due impartiality&#8230;undue prominence etc). </p>
<p>My criticism was unequivocally of the broadcaster not the man. </p>
<p>As for complaining about David Cameron talking about the NHS &#8211; well you can complain to OFCOM if you feel that the Tory leader received -in any one period- undue prominence. Or you could complain to the broadcaster concerned. Generally broadcasters meticulously monitor their own output to ensure there is a reasonable balance (and to answer complaints from political parties &#8211; which are many). But if you think they got it wrong, then tell them. </p>
<p>I think ITV have got it very wrong on this occassion, with this particular &#8220;interview&#8221;, hence my complaint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dead-baby joke not for Cameron &#171; Al Jahom&#8217;s Final Word</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2010/02/08/lib-dems-go-back-to-your-constituencies-and-prepare-to-complain/comment-page-1/#comment-4106</link>
		<dc:creator>Dead-baby joke not for Cameron &#171; Al Jahom&#8217;s Final Word</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=4936#comment-4106</guid>
		<description>[...] pointed out by the whiny yellows at Liberal Vision and later echoed by Tory [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pointed out by the whiny yellows at Liberal Vision and later echoed by Tory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question Does Brown's Piers Morgan Interview Qualify as a Party Election Broadcast?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2010/02/08/lib-dems-go-back-to-your-constituencies-and-prepare-to-complain/comment-page-1/#comment-4083</link>
		<dc:creator>Question Does Brown's Piers Morgan Interview Qualify as a Party Election Broadcast?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=4936#comment-4083</guid>
		<description>[...] one to think this, Liberal Vision has published detailed instructions on how to make a complaint here.  Via TB.      Not currently a member of any party.           Reply With Quote &#160;              [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one to think this, Liberal Vision has published detailed instructions on how to make a complaint here.  Via TB.      Not currently a member of any party.           Reply With Quote &nbsp;              [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2010/02/08/lib-dems-go-back-to-your-constituencies-and-prepare-to-complain/comment-page-1/#comment-4075</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=4936#comment-4075</guid>
		<description>You LibDems really are the Nasty Party Part II aren&#039;t you? I guess you are getting into practice for when you expect to form a coalition with the Nasty Party Part I.

Tell me where we can complain about call-me-Dave saying that the NHS was safe in his hands because his son Ivan died?

For what it&#039;s worth I think this was a mistake because it was possible to say that Brown, unlike Cameron, has not used dead children as an election ploy. Now he has, so that is one all (Clegg doesn&#039;t count in this contest, because, well, he doesn&#039;t count). But don&#039;t whine about it because Cameron (who you hope will be your future coalition partner) wrote the book on using dead kids for political gain.

Oh and the NHS is not safe in his hands, but he&#039;s detoxified the Tories over the NHS by invoking his dead son&#039;s name.

(And if I sound bitter, it is because I have personal experience of a child&#039;s death, and it does wrench your soul apart, but it is personal and should not be used to gain political advantage. The fact that you write this nasty piece just shows that you too want to make political gain over a child&#039;s death.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You LibDems really are the Nasty Party Part II aren&#8217;t you? I guess you are getting into practice for when you expect to form a coalition with the Nasty Party Part I.</p>
<p>Tell me where we can complain about call-me-Dave saying that the NHS was safe in his hands because his son Ivan died?</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth I think this was a mistake because it was possible to say that Brown, unlike Cameron, has not used dead children as an election ploy. Now he has, so that is one all (Clegg doesn&#8217;t count in this contest, because, well, he doesn&#8217;t count). But don&#8217;t whine about it because Cameron (who you hope will be your future coalition partner) wrote the book on using dead kids for political gain.</p>
<p>Oh and the NHS is not safe in his hands, but he&#8217;s detoxified the Tories over the NHS by invoking his dead son&#8217;s name.</p>
<p>(And if I sound bitter, it is because I have personal experience of a child&#8217;s death, and it does wrench your soul apart, but it is personal and should not be used to gain political advantage. The fact that you write this nasty piece just shows that you too want to make political gain over a child&#8217;s death.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathieu</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2010/02/08/lib-dems-go-back-to-your-constituencies-and-prepare-to-complain/comment-page-1/#comment-4074</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathieu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=4936#comment-4074</guid>
		<description>@AngelaHarbutt The reason Nick Clegg wouldn&#039;t get something like this is not because the &quot;establishment&quot; is biased, it&#039;s because Gordon Brown IS the prime minister, whereas Clegg doesn&#039;t have a chance in hell of even coming close to such a position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AngelaHarbutt The reason Nick Clegg wouldn&#8217;t get something like this is not because the &#8220;establishment&#8221; is biased, it&#8217;s because Gordon Brown IS the prime minister, whereas Clegg doesn&#8217;t have a chance in hell of even coming close to such a position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Harbutt</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2010/02/08/lib-dems-go-back-to-your-constituencies-and-prepare-to-complain/comment-page-1/#comment-4005</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Harbutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=4936#comment-4005</guid>
		<description>Jack I understand your position as I think I indicate in my post. But in my view the currently dominant establishment is, in my view,using the system for political advantage. Can you imagine ITV, at the mercy of a Government regulator would afford a minority party this privalege? No. In the circumstances where Nick Clegg for example was to be interviewed, the Govt would lean on the watchdog - the watchdog would lean on ITV and the proposed programme would be stopped in its tracks. This is a dying government using the last vestiges of power to grasp at any advantage it can have over its competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack I understand your position as I think I indicate in my post. But in my view the currently dominant establishment is, in my view,using the system for political advantage. Can you imagine ITV, at the mercy of a Government regulator would afford a minority party this privalege? No. In the circumstances where Nick Clegg for example was to be interviewed, the Govt would lean on the watchdog &#8211; the watchdog would lean on ITV and the proposed programme would be stopped in its tracks. This is a dying government using the last vestiges of power to grasp at any advantage it can have over its competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Forton</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2010/02/08/lib-dems-go-back-to-your-constituencies-and-prepare-to-complain/comment-page-1/#comment-3990</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Forton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=4936#comment-3990</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t complain to ofcom or to ITV, because I believe in freedom of the press, we&#039;ve built up a bizarre distinction in this country between print and televisual media that largely stems from the fact that television was a state monopoly for so long, the sooner we open up broadcasting and allow for OPENLY left leaning or right leaning (and maybe if we&#039;re lucky libertarian leaning) channels to spring up the better, but in the meantime using the bloated bureaucratic ofcom to make a party political point only serves to encourage them and their crusade against political freedom of speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t complain to ofcom or to ITV, because I believe in freedom of the press, we&#8217;ve built up a bizarre distinction in this country between print and televisual media that largely stems from the fact that television was a state monopoly for so long, the sooner we open up broadcasting and allow for OPENLY left leaning or right leaning (and maybe if we&#8217;re lucky libertarian leaning) channels to spring up the better, but in the meantime using the bloated bureaucratic ofcom to make a party political point only serves to encourage them and their crusade against political freedom of speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Harbutt</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2010/02/08/lib-dems-go-back-to-your-constituencies-and-prepare-to-complain/comment-page-1/#comment-3973</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Harbutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=4936#comment-3973</guid>
		<description>ITN news is hard hitting actually - (it won BAFTA for best news programme at the last BAFTA awards) though I agree its coverage on politics outside of election periods is very light. 

Whatever the nature of its news programmes however, ITV should not be broadcasting what amounts to a one hour PPB to 5-6 million people this close to an election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITN news is hard hitting actually &#8211; (it won BAFTA for best news programme at the last BAFTA awards) though I agree its coverage on politics outside of election periods is very light. </p>
<p>Whatever the nature of its news programmes however, ITV should not be broadcasting what amounts to a one hour PPB to 5-6 million people this close to an election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Ansell</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2010/02/08/lib-dems-go-back-to-your-constituencies-and-prepare-to-complain/comment-page-1/#comment-3972</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Ansell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=4936#comment-3972</guid>
		<description>If it was any other channel I would agree. ITN News is hardly hard hitting, and offering critical analysis anyway. Its like th Daily Mail of the TV world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it was any other channel I would agree. ITN News is hardly hard hitting, and offering critical analysis anyway. Its like th Daily Mail of the TV world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

