Mark Littlewood – slightly less influential than Harry Potter
September 21st, 2009 Posted in Uncategorized by Mark Littlewood
Mark Littlewood is rated as the 47th most influential Liberal Democrat by Iain Dale in today’s Telegraph – one place behind Daniel Radcliffe, the actor who plays kid wizard, Harry Potter!
September 21st, 2009 at 4:18 pm
We decided at the Nuremberg Trials that planning aggressive war & bombing civilians were war crimes & massacring, ethnic cleansing, genocide & mass kidnap & rape were crimes against humanity. There is no question that the LibDem leaders, without exception, enthusiastically supported an aggressive war against Yugoslavia conducted overwhelmingly by bombing civilians. That after the occupation of Kosovo they unanimously supported the Massacres, such as Dragodan where at least 210 civilians were murdered by our police, widespread genocide, the ethnic cleansing of at least 350,000 & the kidnap & sale to brothels of thousands, probably 10s of thousands of children. It gas since become public that the British government knew & thus party leaders who are Privy Councillors would have known, that our police kidnapped at at least 1,300 Serbs & dissected them while still alive to sell the parts to our hospitals.
There is clearly a prima faci case that all those involved, including all the leaders of the party, are personally guilty of these war crimes & crimes against humanity.It seems to me that this is a serious charge yet not only have all LibDem MP’s refused to defend themselves in any fact based way* but neither has any
LibDem blogger & the party has made it a condition of membership that one support this genocide. Indeed most of them (listed here http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.com/2009/09/lib-dem-bloggers-who-censor-in-nazi.html) have also censored mention of the facts. It should be unnecessary to point out that censorship (& indeed genocide) is anathema to any real liberal.
I am therefore seeking to find if there is a single “Liberal Democrat” anywhere among the alleged 60,000 members who feels it is possible to dispute, in any factual way, the prima faci case that the entire party leadership are guilty of war crimes, genocide & worse crimes even Hitler didn’t match in the Nazi cause. Alternately is there any single party member who disproves of such atrocities & supports the application of the rule of law to such people.
* The sole person to have been publicly willing to defend the party is Baroness Shirley Williams who admitted that we had done such things but that it was alright because “Milosevic did the same”. She supported that allegation by stating that she personally had seen Yugoslav police carrying out the same atrocities as our police when she visited Belgrade in 1995. While I have to accept this as representing the absolute pinnacle of honesty of which she is capable nobody else has seen this & all other sources say that the fighting in Kosovo took place in Kosovo in 1998/9. When asked to give details of these alleged acts she has repeatedly refused. I’m afraid before accepting that there is any truth in her words I would have to see independent evidence.
September 21st, 2009 at 4:20 pm
Maybe you should join the Tory party Mark if you want influence as you are a Tory in all but name.
September 22nd, 2009 at 1:01 am
Calm down, Ziggy.
Maybe, if Mark wants to come out in favour of tax breaks for marriage, phasing out inheritance tax and cutting the deficit in the middle of the slump, he can be called that. But there is a difference between people who believe in free markets + decentralised liberal choices and rank conservatives, and it is the people who can’t be bothered to understand fine but large distinctions who assert otherwise.
Well, that’s what I think at CentreForum, but no doubt you think we too are part of the fascistic state . . .
September 22nd, 2009 at 2:41 am
‘But there is a difference between people who believe in free markets + decentralised liberal choices and rank conservatives’
I understand that I’ve studied the likes of Hayek eyc
However I fear Mark wants to say anything which will get votes rather then taking a principled stand
September 22nd, 2009 at 10:46 am
“I am therefore seeking to find if there is a single “Liberal Democrat” anywhere among the alleged 60,000 members who feels it is possible to dispute, in any factual way, the prima faci case that the entire party leadership are guilty of war crimes, genocide & worse crimes even Hitler didn’t match…”
Apparently not. I do not believe that any of you think the LibDem credentials of Harry Potter are remotely as important an issue as the guilt of your entire party leadership in crimes matching Hitler’s. Since none of you can even attempt to deny that your silence is clearly intended to condone it.