<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friedrich August Hayek (1899-1992), The Road to Serfdom (1944)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/09/17/friedrich-august-hayek-1899-1992-the-road-to-serfdom-1944-a-synopsis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/09/17/friedrich-august-hayek-1899-1992-the-road-to-serfdom-1944-a-synopsis/</link>
	<description>Looking Forward to Freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misleading visions of the economy &#171; Freethinking Economist</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/09/17/friedrich-august-hayek-1899-1992-the-road-to-serfdom-1944-a-synopsis/comment-page-1/#comment-2403</link>
		<dc:creator>Misleading visions of the economy &#171; Freethinking Economist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=2924#comment-2403</guid>
		<description>[...] in thought-provoking mood.  In what seems to be becoming a series (there&#8217;s an earlier one on Hayek), they have brought in a discussion of Robert Nozik, and in particular his famous Wilt Chamberlain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in thought-provoking mood.  In what seems to be becoming a series (there&#8217;s an earlier one on Hayek), they have brought in a discussion of Robert Nozik, and in particular his famous Wilt Chamberlain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Stocker</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/09/17/friedrich-august-hayek-1899-1992-the-road-to-serfdom-1944-a-synopsis/comment-page-1/#comment-2231</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Stocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=2924#comment-2231</guid>
		<description>I think Thatcher&#039;s &#039;this is what we believe&#039; moment was in private and referred to Hayek&#039;s later &#039;Constitution of Liberty&#039;.  Thatcher queered the pitch for us by doing that, and Hayek queered the pitch himself by becoming more socially conservative and sympathetic to limitations on democracy.  The idea of a dramatic moment in which Clegg announced Lib Dem alignment with thorough going classical liberalism is great, but the party is not ready for that.  It&#039;s up to us to make classical liberal/libertarian ideas more widely known and understood, and gradually shift the terms of debate.  We already have Mill&#039;s &#039;On Liberty&#039; as a party &#039;bible&#039;.  While we should be careful about elevating any one text to cultic status, &#039;On Liberty&#039; is a very good statement of the sort of things LV people believe, though some would like to go further down the non or minimal state road.  If we want to coalesce around one text it should be &#039;On Liberty&#039;, no one can argue it&#039;s some strange import to the party.   &#039;The Road to Serfdom&#039; is fairly close to being a 20th Century equivalent, and we should certainly make it better known to LD people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Thatcher&#8217;s &#8216;this is what we believe&#8217; moment was in private and referred to Hayek&#8217;s later &#8216;Constitution of Liberty&#8217;.  Thatcher queered the pitch for us by doing that, and Hayek queered the pitch himself by becoming more socially conservative and sympathetic to limitations on democracy.  The idea of a dramatic moment in which Clegg announced Lib Dem alignment with thorough going classical liberalism is great, but the party is not ready for that.  It&#8217;s up to us to make classical liberal/libertarian ideas more widely known and understood, and gradually shift the terms of debate.  We already have Mill&#8217;s &#8216;On Liberty&#8217; as a party &#8216;bible&#8217;.  While we should be careful about elevating any one text to cultic status, &#8216;On Liberty&#8217; is a very good statement of the sort of things LV people believe, though some would like to go further down the non or minimal state road.  If we want to coalesce around one text it should be &#8216;On Liberty&#8217;, no one can argue it&#8217;s some strange import to the party.   &#8216;The Road to Serfdom&#8217; is fairly close to being a 20th Century equivalent, and we should certainly make it better known to LD people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian H</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/09/17/friedrich-august-hayek-1899-1992-the-road-to-serfdom-1944-a-synopsis/comment-page-1/#comment-2217</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=2924#comment-2217</guid>
		<description>If he doesn&#039;t, there&#039;ll be trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he doesn&#8217;t, there&#8217;ll be trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giles Smedley</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/09/17/friedrich-august-hayek-1899-1992-the-road-to-serfdom-1944-a-synopsis/comment-page-1/#comment-2214</link>
		<dc:creator>Giles Smedley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=2924#comment-2214</guid>
		<description>Nice article.  Are we, then, to seek Clegg stride into the Commons soon and thump Hayekian volumes down on the dispatch box in a Thatcheresque &#039;this is what we believe&#039; drama ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.  Are we, then, to seek Clegg stride into the Commons soon and thump Hayekian volumes down on the dispatch box in a Thatcheresque &#8216;this is what we believe&#8217; drama ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

