<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Executive Committee told to &#8220;resolve&#8221; Rennard issue or &#8220;it will come back to haunt us&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/18/federal-executive-committee-told-to-resolve-rennard-issue-or-it-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/18/federal-executive-committee-told-to-resolve-rennard-issue-or-it-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/</link>
	<description>Looking Forward to Freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alix</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/18/federal-executive-committee-told-to-resolve-rennard-issue-or-it-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Alix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=783#comment-374</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d assume right, Mr W. It&#039;s obviously not so hard to grasp after all. I passed on some grassroots links and quotes from LDV - and then I said my own piece. The section in which I reflect on the need for the immediate publication of MPs expenses and a solution to the Rennard problem begins with the word &quot;Personally&quot;. The long paragraph Mark has excerpted above began with the words &quot;I also think&quot;. The email was sent from my personal email address, and not from my Voice address. I&#039;m not even sure any of the rest of the LDV team know I sent it, unless they&#039;ve seen this post.

I could, of course, have confirmed all this if anyone had gotten around to asking my permission before they published my email - and I could have pointed out my post of the previous day too, on my own blog. But hey, far more exciting for it to be a &quot;secret&quot; letter and a &quot;significant development at Cowley Street-backed Lib Dem Voice&quot; I guess ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d assume right, Mr W. It&#8217;s obviously not so hard to grasp after all. I passed on some grassroots links and quotes from LDV &#8211; and then I said my own piece. The section in which I reflect on the need for the immediate publication of MPs expenses and a solution to the Rennard problem begins with the word &#8220;Personally&#8221;. The long paragraph Mark has excerpted above began with the words &#8220;I also think&#8221;. The email was sent from my personal email address, and not from my Voice address. I&#8217;m not even sure any of the rest of the LDV team know I sent it, unless they&#8217;ve seen this post.</p>
<p>I could, of course, have confirmed all this if anyone had gotten around to asking my permission before they published my email &#8211; and I could have pointed out my post of the previous day too, on my own blog. But hey, far more exciting for it to be a &#8220;secret&#8221; letter and a &#8220;significant development at Cowley Street-backed Lib Dem Voice&#8221; I guess <img src='http://www.liberal-vision.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wardman</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/18/federal-executive-committee-told-to-resolve-rennard-issue-or-it-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wardman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=783#comment-373</guid>
		<description>&gt;By the way, any reason you didnt put up the post (http://fabulousblueporcupine.wordpress.com/)on Lib Dem Voice and chose instead to put it on your blog?

I&#039;d assume that it is a personal communication and to avoid any confusion with the &quot;semi-official&quot; and group status of LDV.

And a post about Alix took Guido&#039;s site down ... wow :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;By the way, any reason you didnt put up the post (<a href="http://fabulousblueporcupine.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://fabulousblueporcupine.wordpress.com/</a>)on Lib Dem Voice and chose instead to put it on your blog?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d assume that it is a personal communication and to avoid any confusion with the &#8220;semi-official&#8221; and group status of LDV.</p>
<p>And a post about Alix took Guido&#8217;s site down &#8230; wow <img src='http://www.liberal-vision.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Harbutt</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/18/federal-executive-committee-told-to-resolve-rennard-issue-or-it-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Harbutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=783#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Alix on the case re:changing the post. 

By the way, any reason you didnt put up the post (http://fabulousblueporcupine.wordpress.com/)on Lib Dem Voice and chose instead to put it on your blog?
Its your best and most forthright blog on the expenses issue in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alix on the case re:changing the post. </p>
<p>By the way, any reason you didnt put up the post (<a href="http://fabulousblueporcupine.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://fabulousblueporcupine.wordpress.com/</a>)on Lib Dem Voice and chose instead to put it on your blog?<br />
Its your best and most forthright blog on the expenses issue in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Fenwick</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/18/federal-executive-committee-told-to-resolve-rennard-issue-or-it-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Fenwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=783#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Hardly something to be proud of, Alix.

Incidentally, I just spent a coupe of days in the company of a bunch of Lib Dem activists - this issue didn&#039;t come up at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly something to be proud of, Alix.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I just spent a coupe of days in the company of a bunch of Lib Dem activists &#8211; this issue didn&#8217;t come up at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alix</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/18/federal-executive-committee-told-to-resolve-rennard-issue-or-it-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Alix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=783#comment-369</guid>
		<description>I should also add that the email says what I said on my blog yesterday? Guido didn&#039;t originally put the two together either, but now has (and I get a Guido link! hooray!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also add that the email says what I said on my blog yesterday? Guido didn&#8217;t originally put the two together either, but now has (and I get a Guido link! hooray!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alix</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/18/federal-executive-committee-told-to-resolve-rennard-issue-or-it-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Alix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=783#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Angela - no, sorry, what I meant was that the placard-waving bit wasn&#039;t me. It was (as he says) Paul, and I was quoting it (among others) as an example of grass roots feedback.

Would be great if you could amend this in interests of strict accuracy. Ta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angela &#8211; no, sorry, what I meant was that the placard-waving bit wasn&#8217;t me. It was (as he says) Paul, and I was quoting it (among others) as an example of grass roots feedback.</p>
<p>Would be great if you could amend this in interests of strict accuracy. Ta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Harbutt</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/18/federal-executive-committee-told-to-resolve-rennard-issue-or-it-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Harbutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=783#comment-367</guid>
		<description>It appears to be a letter to the members of the Federal Exectuive only. I have not seen it published anywhere and cant find it on Lib Dem Voice though i might be looking in the wrong place ?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears to be a letter to the members of the Federal Exectuive only. I have not seen it published anywhere and cant find it on Lib Dem Voice though i might be looking in the wrong place ?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Harbutt</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/18/federal-executive-committee-told-to-resolve-rennard-issue-or-it-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Harbutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=783#comment-366</guid>
		<description>Paul - if we did not attribute the placard waving comment to you correctly - then accept my apologies (I wont stand down nor will i allow a vote amongst my peers on the issue at this time (something to do with not being substantive !!..).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul &#8211; if we did not attribute the placard waving comment to you correctly &#8211; then accept my apologies (I wont stand down nor will i allow a vote amongst my peers on the issue at this time (something to do with not being substantive !!..).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte Gore</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/18/federal-executive-committee-told-to-resolve-rennard-issue-or-it-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=783#comment-365</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll be very annoying if this, in fact, an open letter but it *looks* like a secret, private letter. Worst of both possible worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be very annoying if this, in fact, an open letter but it *looks* like a secret, private letter. Worst of both possible worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Harbutt</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/18/federal-executive-committee-told-to-resolve-rennard-issue-or-it-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Harbutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/?p=783#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Alix, Having looked at your letter myself now, as it stands, it certainly reads as though the final two paragraphs are from you rather than part of the previous comment. But I can easily see how they may be part of the previous comment. That may just be a formatting issue. 

That aside. I trust that the FE get the mood of the Party on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alix, Having looked at your letter myself now, as it stands, it certainly reads as though the final two paragraphs are from you rather than part of the previous comment. But I can easily see how they may be part of the previous comment. That may just be a formatting issue. </p>
<p>That aside. I trust that the FE get the mood of the Party on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

