<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Stuart Mill &#8211; An Unmarked Anniversary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/</link>
	<description>Looking Forward to Freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Dimitroff</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/comment-page-1/#comment-16913</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Dimitroff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/#comment-16913</guid>
		<description>Hi there, - spotted your current website by accident when wandering around the internet this morning, and delighted that I did! I do like the design and different shades, but I have to point out that I&#039;m having difficulties when it loads. I&#039;m making use of iCab 3 browser for mac, and the footer wouldn&#039;t line up well. i&#039;m convinced I have applied a similar design on a customer&#039;s online site, but the menu seems fine on mine. I imagine the error is with my browser &amp; I&#039;m assuming today&#039;s the day to swap!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, &#8211; spotted your current website by accident when wandering around the internet this morning, and delighted that I did! I do like the design and different shades, but I have to point out that I&#8217;m having difficulties when it loads. I&#8217;m making use of iCab 3 browser for mac, and the footer wouldn&#8217;t line up well. i&#8217;m convinced I have applied a similar design on a customer&#8217;s online site, but the menu seems fine on mine. I imagine the error is with my browser &amp; I&#8217;m assuming today&#8217;s the day to swap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Liberty, 150 Years On at Charlotte Gore</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>On Liberty, 150 Years On at Charlotte Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 11:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>[...] Joyce over on the shiny new Liberal Vision blog laments that, so far, On Liberty&#8217;s 150th Anniversary has gone unmarked. I think that&#8217;s just not good enough, although we do still have over 6 months to put it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joyce over on the shiny new Liberal Vision blog laments that, so far, On Liberty&#8217;s 150th Anniversary has gone unmarked. I think that&#8217;s just not good enough, although we do still have over 6 months to put it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziggy Encaoua</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziggy Encaoua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 22:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Traditionally an original copy has been handed from one party president to the next 

However I’m sorry Ed your deluded if you really think that the Lib Dems are going to start taking any great note of On Liberty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditionally an original copy has been handed from one party president to the next </p>
<p>However I’m sorry Ed your deluded if you really think that the Lib Dems are going to start taking any great note of On Liberty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Its good to see that the anniversary has been noticed on some far flung corners of the web, but it would be fabulous if the original could at least get an airing at the conference in September. I guess that Ros has it in her bookshelf somewhere even if I am right in assuming that she hasn&#039;t paid a great deal of attention to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its good to see that the anniversary has been noticed on some far flung corners of the web, but it would be fabulous if the original could at least get an airing at the conference in September. I guess that Ros has it in her bookshelf somewhere even if I am right in assuming that she hasn&#8217;t paid a great deal of attention to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>The February anniversary was claimed by the British Humanist Association, who sent out a briefing to MPs.

It was unfortunately both an appalling dull piece of typesetting - that would have failed to get through an initial sift of the post by most MP&#039;s researchers or PAs, but because it was written in a drily academic manner with no copy-editing it also failed to convey key messages.

http://www.humanism.org.uk/news/view/240

As On Liberty have the distinction of being one of the few (the only British?) political tracts to sell out on first printing, I&#039;d have thought the best thing would be to try and get media coverage in August during the so called silly season - by &quot;eccentrically&quot; commemorating the 150th anniversary of the second edition, and linking this to Mill&#039;s championing of the right to individuality - too often regarded as eccentricity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The February anniversary was claimed by the British Humanist Association, who sent out a briefing to MPs.</p>
<p>It was unfortunately both an appalling dull piece of typesetting &#8211; that would have failed to get through an initial sift of the post by most MP&#8217;s researchers or PAs, but because it was written in a drily academic manner with no copy-editing it also failed to convey key messages.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.humanism.org.uk/news/view/240" rel="nofollow">http://www.humanism.org.uk/news/view/240</a></p>
<p>As On Liberty have the distinction of being one of the few (the only British?) political tracts to sell out on first printing, I&#8217;d have thought the best thing would be to try and get media coverage in August during the so called silly season &#8211; by &#8220;eccentrically&#8221; commemorating the 150th anniversary of the second edition, and linking this to Mill&#8217;s championing of the right to individuality &#8211; too often regarded as eccentricity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Very Public Sociologist</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>A Very Public Sociologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>The 150th anniversary wasn&#039;t forgotten in my little socialist corner of the internet. I&#039;ve done three pieces so far looking at the essay from a Marxist standpoint. They are &lt;a href=&quot;http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot.com/2009/04/short-note-on-liberties-liberalism-and.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot.com/2009/04/liberty-and-individual-sovereignty.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot.com/2009/04/john-stuart-mills-debating-ethics.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 150th anniversary wasn&#8217;t forgotten in my little socialist corner of the internet. I&#8217;ve done three pieces so far looking at the essay from a Marxist standpoint. They are <a href="http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot.com/2009/04/short-note-on-liberties-liberalism-and.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>, <a href="http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot.com/2009/04/liberty-and-individual-sovereignty.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>, and <a href="http://averypublicsociologist.blogspot.com/2009/04/john-stuart-mills-debating-ethics.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte Gore</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Well, you know, it isn&#039;t completely unmarked - we&#039;ve just marked it. Would be good if others marked it too. 

I know for a fact that Mill&#039;s definition of Liberalism is the uniting force for quite a number of liberal bloggers that are getting together around those ideas he articulated. 

We&#039;re going to be seeing a bit more if his writing soon. Fitting that it happens on an anniversary like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you know, it isn&#8217;t completely unmarked &#8211; we&#8217;ve just marked it. Would be good if others marked it too. </p>
<p>I know for a fact that Mill&#8217;s definition of Liberalism is the uniting force for quite a number of liberal bloggers that are getting together around those ideas he articulated. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re going to be seeing a bit more if his writing soon. Fitting that it happens on an anniversary like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziggy Encaoua</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziggy Encaoua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Oh here&#039;s a link to an audio version http://librivox.org/on-liberty-by-john-stuart-mill/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh here&#8217;s a link to an audio version <a href="http://librivox.org/on-liberty-by-john-stuart-mill/" rel="nofollow">http://librivox.org/on-liberty-by-john-stuart-mill/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziggy Encaoua</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziggy Encaoua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Jock I thought you preferred Hubert Spencer to JS Mill?

Though you’re right the party has forget the ideology Mill set out nor what genuine liberal principle is &amp; that’s why I’m no longer a party member.

Anyways back in January I wrote predicting that there’d be an awful lot of coverage concerning Darwin &amp; The Origins of The Species (published also in 1859) which of course it deserves but they’d be no or little mention of Mill’s On Liberty.

So far the BBC have proved me right lots of programs about Darwin &amp; Evolution but nothing on Mill &amp; liberalism.

I thought about suggesting a letter writing campaign to the BBC but it would be I Ziggy suggesting it so doubt anybody would take note.

You’d of thought the party would of organised some anniversary celebration but maybe that they haven’t is stating all that Jock has said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jock I thought you preferred Hubert Spencer to JS Mill?</p>
<p>Though you’re right the party has forget the ideology Mill set out nor what genuine liberal principle is &amp; that’s why I’m no longer a party member.</p>
<p>Anyways back in January I wrote predicting that there’d be an awful lot of coverage concerning Darwin &amp; The Origins of The Species (published also in 1859) which of course it deserves but they’d be no or little mention of Mill’s On Liberty.</p>
<p>So far the BBC have proved me right lots of programs about Darwin &amp; Evolution but nothing on Mill &amp; liberalism.</p>
<p>I thought about suggesting a letter writing campaign to the BBC but it would be I Ziggy suggesting it so doubt anybody would take note.</p>
<p>You’d of thought the party would of organised some anniversary celebration but maybe that they haven’t is stating all that Jock has said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jock</title>
		<link>http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberal-vision.org/2009/05/14/john-stuart-mill-an-unmarked-anniversary/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Of course it&#039;s unlikely to celebrate it.  Whatever prospective leaders may say about the importance of the book to them and notwithstanding the handing down of it from leader to leader or president to president or whatever it is, basically most of the party have all but forgotten it and the ideology it sets down.

Sadly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it&#8217;s unlikely to celebrate it.  Whatever prospective leaders may say about the importance of the book to them and notwithstanding the handing down of it from leader to leader or president to president or whatever it is, basically most of the party have all but forgotten it and the ideology it sets down.</p>
<p>Sadly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

